Where the Wild Things Are may not be where the children will be.
Posted September 23, 2009 at 9:14 am by Taryl Fultz
2 Comments

Where the Wild Things Are

At least not young children. That is the sense that I am getting from the new movie being released on October 16, 2009. An adaptation of the classic children’s book, the movie has a darker, more sinister feel than many of the book’s core audience may be ready for. Especially since readers of the book start at about age four.

Let me start by saying that I view this book as one of the most formative of my youth. But what a book leaves up to the imagination of the reader, the movie fills in. And while my imagination when reading this book at age four may have only been able to take me so far, the movie takes the viewer where Spike Jonze, the director, wants you to go. Regardless of your age. So it begs the question, to whom is this movie marketed to? Children, teenagers or maybe adults who grew up with the book? I’m guessing it is more of the latter two. The kind of movie that a parent would take a 14-year-old to, not a 4 year old. Which is definitely not a typical target for movies.

I do however, acknowledge that anything that is truly different and unknown makes people apprehensive. When the book first came out there was a negative reaction. Librarians would not order it and parents were concerned about its dark imagery. But children loved it. Sendak claims that is because it respects kids. It doesn’t talk down to them. So I hope that I stand corrected and that children, young included, actually like this film. That is if parents allow their children to see it.

And since this film has been in talks for many years now and only Spike Jonze has gotten Sendak’s approval to bring it to the big screen, let’s hope that their vision will have the same impact on many of today’s children that the book once had on me. And that all this controversy will just make more people go and see it.

Here is an interview with Sendak and Jonze.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

2 Comments

I don’t know about 4-year olds attending the premiere, but I do know that I loved this book when I first read it around age 7/8-ish. If a parent decided to take their child to see this film, I would shake their hand on site. Children’s movies today are filled with so many insincere actors, rediculous plot lines, and bright colors that you feel like you’re actually ON some kind of children’s medication while viewing them. Any child/adult that can relate to the main character can enjoy this film, despite the age. Max, a boy sent to bed without dinner, imagines a world full of adventure and wild beasts that will make him feel more at home than a world full of grown ups. It’s a universal theme: belonging. Spike Jonze has enough vision and prose to successfuly interpret this timeless book into a film medium. Don’t spoon feed kids this aesthetic garbage called “entertainment”, give them something with substance. Even if the cinematography seems a little foreboding, it’ll be good for the kids. I remember the first time I saw Jurassic Park…I literally peed myself in the theatre. But now it’s one of my favorite movies. And don’t forget, Tim Burton (creep aficionado/genius) was given license by Disney to direct AND create “The Nightmare Before Christmas”. If Disney can trust children to look past a couple of spiderwebs and jerky camera angles, maybe the parents can put their trust in an amazing looking film. I mean, c’mon, do it for the kids…

I’m rather upset actually that even THIS (American-release) version has been sanitized. The original cut of the film was screened in Britain, and children were literally screaming and weeping before the end of the film.

That is the version of the film I was hoping for. I hope this edition will not feel watered-down.

Leave a Comment

I have read and agree to Trone's privacy policy